Now, such being the case, he who through an untrained understanding looks upon his Self, which is isolated, as the doer, he, of perverted intelligence, does not see.
Krishna addresses the ego's misidentification as the sole doer of actions. This delusion forms the root of suffering, as one mistakenly claims absolute agency while ignoring the complex factors described earlier. True wisdom recognizes the interdependent nature of all action.
He whose nature is free from egotism, whose understanding is not tainted, though he slays these people, he slays not, nor is he bound.
This verse contains one of the Gita's most profound paradoxes: one who acts without ego-identification is actually not acting at all. The enlightened warrior can fulfill his duty without accruing karma, resolving Arjuna's dilemma about the morality of warfare.
Knowledge, the known and the knower form the threefold impulse to action; the instrument, the action and the doer form the threefold basis of action.
Krishna systematically categorizes the components of action into two triads, creating a comprehensive framework for understanding human behavior. This analytical approach helps transform Arjuna's emotional conflict into philosophical clarity, preparing him for the classification that follows.
Knowledge, action and the doer are declared in the science of the gunas to be of three kinds, according to the distinction of the gunas. Hear them also duly.
Krishna introduces the application of the three gunas (qualities of nature) to knowledge, action, and the doer. This systematic approach reveals how the gunas influence every aspect of life, offering a complete framework for self-understanding and transformation.
That knowledge by which one sees the one indestructible reality in all beings, undivided in the divided, know that knowledge to be sattvic.
The description of sattvic knowledge presents the highest spiritual vision—seeing unity amid diversity. This perspective doesn't deny the world's apparent multiplicity but perceives the underlying wholeness, enabling action that honors both universal principles and particular situations.
But that knowledge which sees multiplicity of beings of different kinds due to their separateness, know that knowledge to be rajasic.
Rajasic knowledge represents partial understanding that sees only separation without underlying unity. While functional on a practical level, this perspective misses the deeper connections between beings, leading to action motivated by self-interest rather than universal welfare.
But that knowledge which clings to one single effect as if it were the whole, without reason, without foundation in truth, and narrow, that is declared to be tamasic.
Tamasic knowledge represents the most limited perspective—focusing narrowly on isolated phenomena without understanding broader contexts or deeper principles. This constricted view leads to dogmatic thinking and actions that create harm due to ignorance of consequences.